As geopolitical tensions rise, fears of ‘deglobalisation’ have taken centre stage. The US–China trade war, Brexit, and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine have led many to conclude that globalisation is unravelling. Yet, despite these shocks, world trade has remained surprisingly resilient, at least through 2023.
In our recent research (Bonadio et al. 2025), we show that the global trading system has not collapsed but reorganised into distinct blocs. This decoupling – the redirection of trade toward friendly partners – has so far produced little loss in global welfare. Instead of deglobalisation, we find a reconfiguration of global trade links, echoing Antràs (2020), who argues that global value chains are adapting rather than retreating.
Since 2016, global trade patterns have undergone a quiet transformation. Using data on bilateral trade flows from 2015 to 2023, we observe that while trade between geopolitical rivals has fallen, it has increased elsewhere. The world trade-to-GDP ratio has stabilised, even reversing its post-financial-crisis decline (Figure 1).
Figure 1 World trade/GDP ratio
What explains this resilience? As Antràs (2020) and Goldberg and Reed (2023) have documented, we are not experiencing deglobalisation but rather fragmentation or decoupling – a reconfiguration of trade links across the globe. As countries involved in trade conflicts disengage from each other, they ramp up trade with other partners. Table 1 confirms this pattern: even as trade between the US and China fell, both economies increased trade with the rest of the world.
Table 1 Change in trade, 2015–2023
We employ a data-driven approach to identify which countries are aligning into which trade blocs. Using bilateral trade data from 2015 to 2023, we identify decoupling patterns and quantify their economic impacts.
We categorise countries into three groups:
We identify revealed trade costs from observed trade flows by running a standard gravity equation. The residual of this equation is then revealed bilateral trade costs, up to the trade elasticity. Our approach, based on observed trade flows, contrasts with alternatives where the bloc structure is imposed on the data using observations like UN voting patterns.
In our analysis of 187 countries, we find that roughly one-quarter of countries have aligned with the US, another quarter with China, and about half remain unaligned. Hong Kong, Israel, Russia, and Saudi Arabia are clearly aligned with China, while European countries, along with India, Korea, Japan, and Singapore, are part of the US bloc.
Using a quantitative multi-country, multi-sector global production network model, we evaluate the economic effects of observed changes in trade costs. Contrary to the widespread belief that fragmentation reduces welfare, the median country experienced a 0.6% increase in real income from trade cost changes between 2015 and 2023.
This surprising result reflects the stability of global trade volumes. Lower trade between some partners was offset by higher trade elsewhere, leaving average trade costs roughly unchanged. As Evenett et al. (2024) note, protectionism has risen selectively rather than universally, producing a world of fragmented openness rather than autarky.
Interestingly, unaligned countries gained slightly more than bloc members (around 0.8%), since they could reorient trade toward both sides. These findings suggest that fragmentation, so far, has not been as costly as feared.
If most countries benefit from decoupling, are they choosing blocs that maximise their welfare? To explore this, we conduct counterfactual exercises, moving countries from one bloc to another. Surprisingly, we find that economic self-interest does not fully account for current bloc formations. The median country in the US bloc would be better off joining the China bloc, and vice versa.
This misalignment implies that geopolitical considerations, rather than purely economic incentives, are driving bloc formation. Campos et al. (2023) similarly highlight that the political economy of bloc formation often diverges from economic self-interest. We show that trade reorientation increasingly mirrors political alliances – measured, for example, by UN voting patterns – rather than comparative advantage.
Three key lessons emerge from our analysis.
Globalisation is not ending – it is being reorganised. The emergence of trade blocs has, until 2023, been more of a reshuffling than a retreat. Most countries have managed to maintain, or even slightly improve, their welfare despite decoupling.
However, as the 2025 trade war escalates and trade barriers rise within blocs, the world may move closer to the true economic costs of fragmentation. Policymakers should therefore focus on preserving the gains from openness while adapting to the geopolitical realities of a multi-bloc world.
Source: cepr.org
Artificial intelligence differs from other technological advancements in finance, such as the initial adoption of…
Industrial raw materials such as nickel, cobalt, and rare earths are critical inputs in countless…
As European governments scale up investment, bond market stability is more critical than ever. This…
Economists have long warned of the negative consequences of excessive US public debt (e.g. Friedman…
Financial distress affects roughly one in five adults in OECD countries (OECD 2024). It constrains…
Until 2018, the US-China trade data gap was in line with the discrepancies found in…