Recent years have seen a global shift towards illiberal forms of governance, where democratic institutions and liberal norms are progressively undermined. These regime transitions carry not only political implications but also deep economic and social consequences, as policy priorities shift and the distribution of state resources is reshaped.
Immigration is often a central force in these dynamics. In periods of heightened cross-border migration, host societies – especially those experiencing institutional fragility – may respond with heightened political tension. Cultural anxieties, fears over labour market competition, and concerns about the sustainability of welfare systems frequently come to the fore (Dustmann et al. 2019, Halla et al. 2017).
Research by Loungani and Razin (2001) and Razin and Wahba (2015) has shown how welfare-state dynamics affect the composition of migrants along skill lines. More recent political economy literature extends this work by exploring the role of regime type – liberal versus illiberal – in shaping migration flows (Hatton and Williamson 2002, Geddes 2015).
Liberal democracies tend to attract immigrants and retain native talent due to their civil liberties, personal security, and institutional predictability. In contrast, illiberal regimes often drive out citizens – particularly the skilled and educated – by curtailing freedoms and limiting economic prospects (Docquier et al. 2007).
De Haas et al. (2019) argue that democratisation initially spurs emigration as mobility restrictions are lifted and aspirations rise. But over time, democratic consolidation tends to reduce emigration as governance and development improve. Conversely, democratic backsliding triggers large-scale emigration – especially ‘brain drain’ – well before formal institutional changes occur (Boeri et al. 2012, Giuliano and Spilimbergo 2009).
Portes (2022) examines the impact of the Brexit-induced regime change on migration and trade. Long-term migration preferences, inferred from voting data, are studied by Peri et al. (2022). Transitions from liberal to illiberal democracies have profound effects on real economic indicators such as growth (Razin 2024).
In a recent paper (Razin 2025), I employ the Civil and Human Rights Integrity (CHRI) Index to capture the institutional quality and robustness of civil rights across countries. Within the EU, both emigration and immigration are shaped not only by domestic factors but also by the institutional and economic frameworks of integration.
I employ a difference-in-differences (DiD) framework to isolate the causal effects of regime change and migration on one another. The core variables include:
The sample covers 2006-2023 and includes EU and OECD member states, as well as select non-EU advanced economies. Data sources include the OECD, the Fund for Peace, and national statistical agencies.
Figure 1 provides empirical support for the hypothesis that immigration may contribute to institutional weakening in host countries. We see that higher CHRI values – signifying weaker governance – are positively associated with increased immigration-to-labour-force ratios. This effect is particularly pronounced in EU countries. These findings suggest that rising immigration flows may exacerbate institutional fragility, especially in politically vulnerable democracies. While immigration brings economic and demographic benefits, it can also strain governance frameworks when institutions are already under pressure.
Figure 1 Legal governance and immigration, EU countries
Panels A and B of Figure 2 explore the emigration response to regime transitions from liberal to illiberal political systems. Using the difference-in-differences method, we introduce a treatment dummy variable, POST1, which equals 1 in the year of the regime change and all subsequent years.
We observe a marked rise in emigration rates following such transitions, particularly among the educated workforce. This supports the view that political repression and uncertainty drive anticipatory emigration, undermining the capacity for future institutional recovery.
Figure 2 Emigration response to regime transitions
A) Emigration and liberal-illiberal regime transition, OECD countries
B) Average emigration-to-labour ratio before and after transition from liberal to illiberal regime
International economic integration – particularly through EU accession – facilitates emigration from weak democratic countries. Countries that became EU members exhibit increased emigration from the year of accession onward. The timing of EU accession is captured by the variable POST2, a dummy that takes a value of 1 starting in the year a country joins the EU and remains 1 in all subsequent years. For countries that did not join the EU during the sample period, POST2 remains 0 throughout. This variable identifies the potential impact of EU membership on migration and related economic or institutional outcomes.
Panels A and B of Figure 3 show that accession to the EU has a positive effect on emigration flows: countries that became EU members exhibit increased emigration from the year of accession onward. The timing of EU accession is captured by the variable POST2, a dummy that takes a value of 1 starting in the year a country joins the EU and remains 1 in all subsequent years. For countries that did not join the EU during the sample period, POST2 remains 0 throughout. This variable identifies the potential impact of EU membership on migration and related economic or institutional outcomes.
Figure 3 Emigration flows and accession to the EU
A) Emigration and access to the EU, OECD countries
B) Mean emigration-to-immigration ratio by EU accession status
Figure 4 demonstrates a significant inverse relationship between emigration from other countries and a country’s CHRI score. That is, increases in emigration abroad correlate with improvements in domestic legal governance.
One interpretation is that global emigration surges – possibly triggered by economic or political shocks – prompt receiving countries to bolster institutional quality in order to manage these pressures effectively.
Figure 4 Governance and external emigration pressures, EU countries
This column has explored the dynamic interrelationship between migration flows and political regime change, particularly the transition from liberal democratic systems to illiberal or hybrid regimes. The empirical findings – grounded in cross-country panel regressions and difference-in-differences analysis – highlight a dual causal mechanism. First, deteriorating democratic institutions tend to trigger emigration surges, as individuals seek stability, opportunity, and security elsewhere. Second, rising immigration – particularly in advanced economies – can place pressure on institutional capacity, potentially weakening the rule of law and contributing to illiberal political drift.
This column underscores the reciprocal relationship between migration and regime change. Key implications include the following:
Source: cepr.org
Artificial intelligence differs from other technological advancements in finance, such as the initial adoption of…
Industrial raw materials such as nickel, cobalt, and rare earths are critical inputs in countless…
As European governments scale up investment, bond market stability is more critical than ever. This…
Economists have long warned of the negative consequences of excessive US public debt (e.g. Friedman…
Financial distress affects roughly one in five adults in OECD countries (OECD 2024). It constrains…
Until 2018, the US-China trade data gap was in line with the discrepancies found in…